Legislature(2015 - 2016)
2016-03-10 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2016-03-10 House Journal Page 1770 HB 256 The following, which was advanced to third reading from the March 9, 2016, calendar (page 1762), was read the third time: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 256(FIN) "An Act making appropriations for the operating and loan program expenses of state government and for certain programs; capitalizing funds; amending appropriations; repealing appropriations; making supplemental appropriations; and providing for an effective date." Representative Reinbold moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 256(FIN) be returned to second reading for the specific purpose of considering Amendment No. 1. There being no objection, it was so ordered. The Speaker stated that, without objection, CSHB 256(FIN) would be returned to second reading for all amendments. Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Reinbold: Page 13, line 21: Delete "9,756,900" Insert "8,756,900" 2016-03-10 House Journal Page 1771 Delete "5,509,200" Insert "4,509,200" Page 13, line 28: Delete "2,552,000" Insert "1,552,000" Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. Representative Reinbold moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Representative Josephson objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 256(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 1 NAYS: 37 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Reinbold Nays: Chenault, Claman, Colver, Drummond, Edgmon, Foster, Gara, Gattis, Guttenberg, Herron, Hughes, Johnson, Josephson, Kawasaki, Keller, Kito, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Neuman, Olson, Ortiz, Pruitt, Saddler, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Talerico, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Tuck, Vazquez, Wilson, Wool Excused: Hawker, Nageak And so, Amendment No. 1 was not adopted. Amendment No. 2 was offered by Representative Reinbold: Page 12, line 3: Delete "234,430,300" Insert "229,430,300" Delete "15,914,900" Insert "14,422,900" 2016-03-10 House Journal Page 1772 Delete "218,515,400" Insert "215,007,400" Page 12, line 4: Delete "160,366,500" Insert "155,366,500" Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. Representative Reinbold moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 2 be adopted. Representative Gattis objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 256(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 3 NAYS: 35 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Ortiz, Reinbold, Tuck Nays: Chenault, Claman, Colver, Drummond, Edgmon, Foster, Gara, Gattis, Guttenberg, Herron, Hughes, Johnson, Josephson, Kawasaki, Keller, Kito, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Saddler, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Talerico, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Vazquez, Wilson, Wool Excused: Hawker, Nageak Ortiz changed from "Nay" to "Yea". And so, Amendment No. 2 was not adopted. Amendment No. 3 was offered by Representative Reinbold: Page 20, line 3: Delete "301,419,500" Insert "283,694,800" Delete "150,369,300" Insert "132,644,600" 2016-03-10 House Journal Page 1773 Page 20, lines 15 - 16: Delete all material. Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. Representative Reinbold moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 3 be adopted. Representative Saddler objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 3 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 256(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 3 YEAS: 1 NAYS: 37 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Reinbold Nays: Chenault, Claman, Colver, Drummond, Edgmon, Foster, Gara, Gattis, Guttenberg, Herron, Hughes, Johnson, Josephson, Kawasaki, Keller, Kito, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Neuman, Olson, Ortiz, Pruitt, Saddler, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Talerico, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Tuck, Vazquez, Wilson, Wool Excused: Hawker, Nageak And so, Amendment No. 3 was not adopted. Amendment No. 4 was not offered. Amendment No. 5 was offered by Representative Reinbold: Page 7, line 30: Delete "21,895,100" Insert "19,495,200" Delete "2,399,900" Page 8, line 9: Delete "21,895,100" Insert "19,495,200" Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. 2016-03-10 House Journal Page 1774 Representative Reinbold moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 5 be adopted. Representative Pruitt objected. Representatives Millett, Herron, LeDoux, Stutes, Kreiss-Tomkins, Seaton, and Olson moved and asked unanimous consent to abstain from voting because of a conflict of interest. Objection was heard, and they were required to vote. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 5 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 256(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 5 YEAS: 1 NAYS: 37 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Reinbold Nays: Chenault, Claman, Colver, Drummond, Edgmon, Foster, Gara, Gattis, Guttenberg, Herron, Hughes, Johnson, Josephson, Kawasaki, Keller, Kito, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Neuman, Olson, Ortiz, Pruitt, Saddler, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Talerico, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Tuck, Vazquez, Wilson, Wool Excused: Hawker, Nageak And so, Amendment No. 5 was not adopted. Amendment No. 6 was offered by Representative Reinbold: Page 11, following line 22: Insert new material to read: "It is the intent of the legislature that the Department of Education and Early Development adhere to AS 14.07.020(b), which prohibits the department from expending money to implement standards established by the Common Core Standards Initiative. According to the commissioner, Alaska academic standards are based on the Common Core Standards Initiative. Alaska academic standards are "nearly identical" to the Common Core Standards Initiative. The department's Internet website confirms that Alaska academic standards 2016-03-10 House Journal Page 1775 were modified only for clarity from the Common Core Standards Initiative. To align with state statutes, the department shall adhere to AS 14.07.020(b)." Representative Reinbold moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 6 be adopted. Representative Wilson objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 6 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 256(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 6 YEAS: 1 NAYS: 37 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Reinbold Nays: Chenault, Claman, Colver, Drummond, Edgmon, Foster, Gara, Gattis, Guttenberg, Herron, Hughes, Johnson, Josephson, Kawasaki, Keller, Kito, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Neuman, Olson, Ortiz, Pruitt, Saddler, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Talerico, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Tuck, Vazquez, Wilson, Wool Excused: Hawker, Nageak Wool changed from "Yea" to "Nay". And so, Amendment No. 6 was not adopted.